AMD Radeon RX 5700 review: An outstanding GPU for the price

It'south been easy to write AMD off over the years, and when building a gaming PC, it was like shooting fish in a barrel to stick with the pairing of Intel and NVIDIA. But the "red squad" has been beavering away, and as we head into the latter half of 2022, information technology's now a very real possibility you might want an all-AMD gaming PC.

The launch of the seven-nanometer (nm) Ryzen 3000 serial CPUs captured the headlines, and with skilful reason, but launching alongside it are the company'southward first 2 GPUs based on its 7nm Navi architecture.

I picked up an RX 5700 for myself to see what all the fuss is nigh. Ryzen might have been capturing the headlines, but from what I can see, Navi shouldn't be ignored.

7nm for the masses

AMD Radeon RX 5700

Lesser line: AMD'south new RX 5700 delivers incredible operation for a mid-range price. It'due south a perfect upgrade from a Polaris-based GPU or an entirely new build in which keeping the price down is important, though owners of a Vega 56 or Vega 64 should probably hold off.

Pros

• Bully performance at 1440p
• Quiet fan
• Looks proficient
• Low power draw
• Temps under load less than previous AMD GPUs

Cons

• Terrible stock fan curve
• No backplate

The Radeon RX 5700

Right now, regardless of the brand on the box, at that place is but one RX 5700 out in the wild, and that's the reference design you lot see hither. Third parties such as ASRock and MSI have begun teasing their own custom takes on information technology, just those aren't expected until some fourth dimension in August.

Then what practise y'all get? Here are some of the headline specs:

• Compute units - 36.
• Base frequency - 1465 MHz.
• Boost frequency - Upwardly to 1725 MHz.
• Peak pixel fill-charge per unit - Up to 110.4 GP/s.
• Pinnacle texture fill-rate - Up to 248.4 GT/s.
• Acme half-precision compute functioning - xv.ix TFLOPs.
• Peak single-precision compute performance - 7.95 TFLOPs.
• ROPs - 64.
• Stream Processors - 2304.
• Texture units - 144.
• Memory - 8GB GDDR6.

At that place are already some great, super-techy reviews out there from folks way smarter than I am (like this one from AnandTech). For this, I'k looking at it from a more than boilerplate consumer perspective. I have a gaming PC, I picked up this new GPU, and I'm going to see what information technology's like to use compared to my old i. Simple.

The test rig

All testing on the RX 5700 was carried out inside my own personal gaming PC, the main components of which are:

• AMD Ryzen vii 2700X at 4.05 GHz.
• AORUS X470 Ultra Gaming motherboard.
• 32GB GSkill Trident Z 3200 MHZ DDR4 RAM.
• EVGA Supernova 750W PSU.
• Radeon RX Vega 64 reference blueprint.

All were run on the launch 19.7.i Adrenalin drivers for both the RX 5700 and the comparisons on the RX Vega 64.

The stock fan curve is horrible

Modify the fan curve before you practise anything else.

Not everyone who builds a gaming PC wants to spend their time tweaking and optimizing, squeezing every little bit of performance from their system. Many simply want to build information technology, turn information technology on and become gaming. In the case of the RX 5700 right now, though, at that place'south something yous'll want to practise right away: Set up the stock fan curve. Because information technology is dreadful.

The stock fan curve is horrible and must be fixed.

Having read some of the other reviews, many were seeing temperatures at idle in the high 30s, low 40s (in Celsius) or ~100 Fahrenheit (F), while my ain RX 5700 was sitting closer to 60C (140 degrees F). A temperature that high at idle ever sets alarm bells ringing, merely taking a look inside the Wattman section of the Radeon Settings app before long fabricated things clear.

You need to set up the fan or temperature curve to manual and move the points on the graph and then the fans are a lilliputian faster at lower temperatures. It doesn't take long, and on the first effort, I managed to bring the idle temperature downwardly by 15 C (59 F). The drawback is increased noise from the fan. But I know which I'm happier with, specially given that the ambience temperature in my office right now is shut to that of the World's core. The fan isn't too bad, though it's a little comeback on the reference Vega cards at to the lowest degree, only earlier likewise long the third-parties will come up along and brand it even better.

Heat and power

It should be said though that fifty-fifty with a horrific stock fan curve, nether load the RX 5700 handles itself beautifully. The new 7nm Navi compages draws less power than the Vega that came before information technology and generates less heat. At idle, the RX 5700 is pulling just 35W while driving ii displays.

The RX 5700 pulls quite a fleck less power and generates less heat than Vega.

Going back to the previous generation Vega 64 which, usually sits in my gaming PC, the comparisons are impressive. At stock settings, the Vega 64 would quite easily become up to 85 C (185 F) and brainstorm to throttle. The hottest the RX 5700 has reached in the same system (ignoring the fan curve changes) has been 76 C (169 F) while enduring a benchmark run.

In gaming, things are even meliorate. During a 3 60 minutes session of Sunset Overdrive at 1440p, the RX 5700 peaked at 67 C (153 F), and in the aforementioned session, the maximum power draw for the GPU was 160W. Both of these are significantly less than the Vega 64 while offering most identical gaming performance.

Impressive operation

The RX 5700 criterion run in Far Cry v.

Nobody is pretending that the new Navi GPUs are going to take over the world and topple NVIDIA's finest. Realistically speaking, they're gunning for the RTX 2060 and 2070 in that mid-tier space. I don't have one of those handy for reference, but I do have an AMD RX Vega 64 to act as a comparison.

To put the RX 5700 through its paces, I pulled games out of my library that requite a good spread, and in some cases, are favorable towards AMD hardware. All tests were run using in-game benchmark tools and were completed at 1440p on whatever the maximum graphics preset for each game was. It's also worth pointing out that the RX 5700 was entirely stock aside from a custom fan curve, while my reference Vega 64 runs an undervolt to 1050 mV and a memory clock speed of 1100 MHz. It'due south essentially an out of the box RX 5700 versus the best I could go from my own Vega 64.

Which makes the beneath results even more impressive.

	RX 5700	RX Vega 64
3DMark Fire Strike	19,334 (Graphics: 22,319)	20,664 (Graphics 24,861)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (DX12)	68 frames per 2nd avg (Low of 53 FPS)	67 frames per second avg (Low of 54 FPS)
Deus Ex Mankind Divided	60.1 FPS avg (Depression of 48.1 FPS)	61.seven FPS avg (Low of 29.one FPS)
Far Weep 5	81 FPS avg (Low of 65 FPS)	85 FPS avg (Low of 71 FPS)
Ashes of the Singularity	59.7 FPS avg (Low of 48 FPS)	63.ix FPS avg (Depression of 47 FPS)
Strange Brigade (Vulkan)	106 FPS (Low of 68.7 FPS)	107.7 FPS (Depression of 15.one FPS)
F1 2022 (DX12)	99 FPS avg (Depression of 88 FPS)	98 FPS avg (Depression of 80 FPS)
For Award	96.85 FPS avg (Depression of 34.five FPS)	87 FPS avg (Depression of 68.2 FPS)

3DMark shows the biggest disparity between the two, but on the whole, when gaming, the functioning of the RX 5700 matches that of the Vega 64. The two are most identical maxed out at 1440p, and comparisons aside, the numbers are very impressive for a $350 GPU.

And every bit already mentioned, that gaming performance that matches the Vega 64 comes with less heat and a significantly lower ability depict.

And so should you buy an AMD Radeon RX 5700?

Whether you should buy one or not depends mostly on what you lot already have. If you're thinking of upgrading from either of the 2 previous-generation RX Vega GPUs, you'd probably exercise well belongings off, at least on the RX 5700. As we've seen, the performance is on par, albeit with lower temperatures and power draw, only aside from having the latest, shiniest affair, it's arguably not the upgrade to make for yous.

The RX 5700 puts AMD firmly back in the mix.

Notwithstanding, ignoring upgrades or what you might already take and taking it at face up value, the RX 5700 is a very skillful selection, especially for $350. Had the pre-launch toll cuts not come in, the answer might well have had a "only." Alas, that isn't the instance, and information technology's a very potent choice in the mid-range. As we've seen, it'south going to eat upwardly all the 1440p gaming you tin throw at information technology for a while to come up.

Finally, with Navi, AMD doesn't merely have adept performance; it has good performance that doesn't have a small power plant to run, nor i that generates plenty warm air to oestrus your business firm through the wintertime. And when the third-party cards come up with their own cooling solutions and piece of cake overclocks, paired with AMD's excellent commuter evolution, the RX 5700 is simply going to go stronger. Have a look at our all-time graphics carte du jour picks to encounter where information technology ranks.

The ruddy team is back.

Incredible value

AMD Radeon RX 5700

The new champ in the mid-range

With Vega 64-esque performance at 1440p and without the rut and power draw, the RX 5700 is an extremely attractive GPU.

Nosotros may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Acquire more.

Solid Foundations

ASUS ROG Strix X570-East is the all-time motherboard for Ryzen ix 5900X

The motherboard tin show a approval or a hindrance when used with loftier-performance processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, depending on which you become for. We've rounded up the best B550 and X570 motherboards that are compatible with the new Ryzen processor.

Source: https://www.windowscentral.com/radeon-rx-5700

Posted by: bustosgrosen.blogspot.com

Share this post